Eisen v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that right to allocution is not guaranteed by United States Constitution but noting that United States Supreme Court has not itself answered that question
• concluding that right to allocution is not guaranteed by United States Constitution but noting that United States Supreme Court has not itself answered that question
• holding that “court’s failure to follow article 42.07 was not preserved for our review” where the “issue [was raised] for the first time on appeal”
• “We hold that the common law right of allocution did not achieve constitutional status.”
• “We hold that the common law right of allocution did not achieve constitutional status.”
• “We hold that the common-law right of allocution did not achieve constitutional status.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).