Skip to main content
· 1/22/1884

Einstman v. Black

Citations

  • 14 Ill. App. 381
  • 1883 Ill. App. LEXIS 205

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting plaintiff’s argument that the district court should have granted his pre-service motion for partial summary judgment where the “motion was premature because the defendants had not had the opportunity to amass any evidence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Higbee

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.