Eiler v. South Dakota Human Services Center

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that “Plaintiffs’ FAC states a valid claim for restitution [under California law]” because “Plaintiffs allege that Defendants unjustly charged Plaintiffs for backdated policies and that Defendants wrongfully earned commissions and kickbacks at Plaintiffs’ expense”
• permitting a breach-of-contract cause of action alleging that \excessive\ premiums are not \necessary\ to protect a property's value, where the mortgage allowed a lender to procure \necessary\ insurance
• denying motion to dismiss claims alleging unfair force-placed flood insurance practices under UCL because the court could not determine, as a matter of law, that the allegations would not meet any of the unfairness tests
• “An implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing cannot contradict the terms of a contract.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).