Eiland v. Wolf

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding a university catalog was not an enforceable contract because the catalog suggested that it was not a contract and that its provisions were subject to change without notice
• “A basic requisite of a contract is an intent to be bound, and the catalog’s express language negates, as a matter of law, an inference of such intent on the part of the university.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).