Skip to main content
· 7/14/1995

Eiland v. Westinghouse Elec. Corp.

Citations

  • 58 F.3d 176
  • 1995 WL 382602

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “the decision to grant or deny a motion for new trial … rests in the sound discretion of the trial judge”
  • “the decision to grant or deny a motion for new trial … rests in the sound discretion of the trial judge”
  • “the decision to grant or deny a motion for new trial … rests in the sound discretion of the trial judge”
  • “the decision to grant or deny a motion for new trial ... rests in the sound discretion of the trial judge”
  • “[A]n instruction on present value reduction of lost earnings is proper on request of the defendant if there is evidence to support it, but is waived without proper request.”
  • \The decision to grant or deny a motion for new trial or remittitur rests in the sound discretion of the trial judge; that exercise of discretion can be set aside only upon a clear showing of abuse\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.