Eigles v. State Farm Auto. Ins. Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that this court generally does not consider arguments raised for first time on appeal absent exceptional circumstances
• recognizing that, absent exceptional circumstances, we do not consider claims raised for the first time on appeal
• recognizing that, absent exceptional circumstances, we do not consider claims raised for the first time on appeal
• recognizing that, absent exceptional circumstances, we do not consider claims raised for the first time on appeal
• holding that failure to argue on appeal for fundamental error “marks the end of the road for [an] argument for reversal not first presented to the district court” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• recognizing that issues newly raised on appeal are not considered absent exceptional circumstances

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).