Eight Hundred Bales of Cotton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “nothing more than a single passing comment during defense counsel’s opening statement” may not be enough without more, to open the door
• noting that because there was “nothing more than a single passing comment during defense counsel’s opening statement,” the door was not opened for a government response to the comment
• refusal to consent may not be considered as evidence of United States v. Moran, No. 06-0207/AF criminal conduct
• \Refusal to consent to a warrantless search is privileged conduct which cannot be considered as evidence of criminal wrongdoing.\ (quotation and citation omitted)
• “Refusal to consent to a warrantless search is privileged conduct which cannot be considered as evidence of criminal wrongdoing.” (quotation and citation omitted)
• improper to comment on appellant’s refusal to consent to search

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).