Eidemiller v. Davis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding legal, not equitable, relief was proper when available even where a defendant is insolvent
• explaining that the owner of the abutting property’s “fee in the street is appurtenant to the title to the abutting land, he cannot sell the fee in the street independent of the same”
• allegation that obligor is insolvent and that money judgment would be uncollectible insufficient to show inadequacy of legal remedies
• “The easements of an abutting owner cannot be reserved or conveyed, or exist separate from the property to which they pertain, so that land shall be owned by one, and the easements by another.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).