Eichenlaub v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• adopting the views expressed in Meyers v. Welch for purposes of deciding an identical section 2255 motion brought by the same prisoner, on the same grounds, in the District Court for the District of Columbia

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• James E. Adams v. United States
  D.C. Circuit· 1955-04-21· cited 55×
• Mason v. United States
  D.C. Circuit· 1951-11-08· cited 41×
• United States v. Anthony Angelet and William Angelet
  Second Circuit· 1958-05-19· cited 36×
• Norman E. Smith v. United States
  D.C. Circuit· 1959-07-07· cited 35×
• Melanson v. O'brien, Warden
  First Circuit· 1951-10-26· cited 32×
• United States v. Richard Emerson Bonnette, Jr.
  Fourth Circuit· 1986-01-07· cited 26×
• United States Ex Rel. Josey v. Humphrey
  Third Circuit· 1954-03-03· cited 8×
• Smith v. Reid
  D.C. Circuit· 1951-07-12· cited 7×
• Krausse v. United States. Papp v. United States
  Second Circuit· 1952-02-25· cited 7×
• United States v. Gandia
  Second Circuit· 1958-05-15· cited 7×
• United States v. Ryan
  E.D. New York· 1973-04-24· cited 5×
• Melanson v. O'brien, Warden
  First Circuit· 1953-04-27· cited 1×