Eichenlaub v. Township of Indiana

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a landowner’s speech at a township board of supervisors meeting relating to zoning dispute, for which township allegedly retaliated against him and his family, was entitled to First Amendment protection
• “Prison officials are likely to have greater legal expertise and, as important, superior access to prison administrative records in comparison to prisoners.” (alteration omitted)
• To establish a substantive violation of due process, a plaintiff must satisfy the \shocks the conscience\ standard and \only the most egregious official conduct\ satisfies this standard

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).