Eichelberger v. Warner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the- phrase “arising out of’’requires “but for” causation
• explaining that all-risk policies should be interpreted broadly
• “Exceptions to an insurer’s general liability are accordingly to be interpreted narrowly against the insurer.”
• under different canons of construction, comparable terms (he., “arising out of the... use” of a vehicle
• “ ‘ “[A]rising out of,” means causally connected with, not proximately caused by. “But for” causation, i.e., a cause and result relationship, is enough to satisfy this provision of the policy-’ ”
• ambiguous coverage clause to be interpreted broadly to afford greatest possible protection to insured

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).