Skip to main content
· 5/6/1992

Eichel v. Ullah

Citations

  • 831 S.W.2d 42
  • 1992 Tex. App. LEXIS 1121
  • 1992 WL 92623

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that plaintiffs delay, even if for only two months, without any activity aimed at notifying or serving the defendant established a lack of due diligence as a matter of law
  • noting the ease with which the plaintiff could have found the defendant’s new address by contacting the defendant’s known insurance company
  • two months between fifing suit and issuance of citation, and nine months without any activity at all aimed at finding or serving defendant
  • unexplained delay of nine months

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Osborn, C.J., and Koehler and Larsen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.