· 5/6/1992
Eichel v. Ullah
Citations
- 831 S.W.2d 42
- 1992 Tex. App. LEXIS 1121
- 1992 WL 92623
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that plaintiffs delay, even if for only two months, without any activity aimed at notifying or serving the defendant established a lack of due diligence as a matter of law
- noting the ease with which the plaintiff could have found the defendant’s new address by contacting the defendant’s known insurance company
- two months between fifing suit and issuance of citation, and nine months without any activity at all aimed at finding or serving defendant
- unexplained delay of nine months
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Osborn, C.J., and Koehler and Larsen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.