Skip to main content
· 12/27/1983

Eichacker v. Speltz

Citations

  • 344 N.W.2d 571
  • 1983 Iowa App. LEXIS 1851

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting facial vagueness challenge on grounds statute would be unconstitutional if applied to third parties in hypothetical situations
  • rule that general statute should yield to specific one is rule of interpretation used to determine which statute legislature intended to be applied in particular case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gel, Hayden, Schle, Snell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.