Skip to main content
· 4/28/2004

E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company, Inc. v. United States

Citations

  • 365 F.3d 1367
  • 58 ERC (BNA) 1321
  • 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 8368
  • 2004 WL 899979

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • The Termination Supplement preserved all indemnification claims and “apparently included no termination or expiration date.”
  • “CERCLA evolved from the doctrine of common law nuisance.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Michel, Rader, Schall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.