· 4/28/2004
E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company, Inc. v. United States
Citations
- 365 F.3d 1367
- 58 ERC (BNA) 1321
- 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 8368
- 2004 WL 899979
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- The Termination Supplement preserved all indemnification claims and “apparently included no termination or expiration date.”
- “CERCLA evolved from the doctrine of common law nuisance.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Michel, Rader, Schall
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.