Ehrlich v. Grove

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that an interlocutory appeal was appropriate under the “extraordinary circumstances involving discovery orders directed to a high government official.”
• concluding that “the propriety of a potential intrusion on [executive] privilege[] has nothing to do with the merits of [the plaintiff’s] wrongful termination claim.”
• concluding that an interlocutory appeal was appropriate under the “extraordinary circumstances involving discovery orders directed to a high government official.”
• recognizing that an interlocutory appeal was appropriate under the “extraordinary circumstances involving discovery orders directed to a high government official.”
• concluding that “the propriety of a potential intrusion on [executive] privilege[ ] has nothing to do with the merits of [the plaintiffs] wrongful termination claim.”
• holding that an interlocutory appeal is appropriate under the extraordinary circumstance of a discovery order being directed to a Governor of Maryland when the collateral order doctrine’s four-part test is met

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).