Skip to main content
· 8/11/2010

Ehrlich v. BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC

Citations

  • 801 F. Supp. 2d 908
  • 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 143386
  • 2010 WL 7164974

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the “weight of authority” states “the plain language of section 1792 of the Song–Beverly Act does not impose a . . . vertical privity requirement.”
  • no need to allege that the defective windshields have 22 already actually caused injuries
  • plaintiff failed to allege reliance on omission where he did not allege “that, before he bought his [vehicle], he reviewed any brochure, website, or promotional material that might have contained a disclosure”
  • four-year express warranty tolled statute of limitations for implied warranty claim
  • granting leave to amend to cure deficiencies

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Audrey B. Collins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.