Ehrhart v. Commissioner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ‘‘[the defendant’s] argument that the [c]onstitution bars considering acquitted conduct during sentencing is foreclosed by [United States] Supreme Court precedent’’
• “On sufficiency of the evidence review, however, ‘[w]e do not make credibility determinations.’ Those are ‘the sole province of the jury.’ . . . The jury was free to credit [the defendant] or the witnesses against him; it chose the latter.” (first alteration in original

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).