Skip to main content
· 5/4/1885

Ehrhardt v. Hogaboom

Citations

  • 115 U.S. 67
  • 5 S. Ct. 1157
  • 29 L. Ed. 346
  • 1885 U.S. LEXIS 1817

Syllabus

<p>In an action of ejectment for lands in California, where the plaintiff traces title to the lands from a patent of the United States issued to a settler under the pre-emption laws, oral evidence is inadmissible on the part of the defendant to show that the lands were not open to settlement under those laws, but were swamp and overflowed lands, which passed to the Stats under the act of September 28, 1850.</p> <p>It is the duty of the Land Department, of which the Secretary of the Interior is the head, to determine whether land patented to á settler is of the class subject to settlement under the pre-emption laws, and his judgment as to this fact is not open to contestation, in an action at law, by a mere intruder without title.</p>

Judges: Field

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.