Skip to main content
· 4/22/1970

Ehrhardt v. Costello

Citations

  • 437 Pa. 556
  • 264 A.2d 620
  • 1970 Pa. LEXIS 920

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “the filing of such praecipe, irrespective of whether the Prothonotary issued the writ or the Sheriff served it, constituted the ‘commencement’ of an action under Pa.R.Civ.P. 1007(1)”
  • where plaintiff originally filed a void action against a deceased person by writ, but later filed – after the statute of limitations had run – a complaint against the personal representative of the deceased at the same docket, the new filing did not cure the jurisdictional defect

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bell, Jones, Cohen, Eagen, O'Brien, Roberts, Pomeroy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.