Skip to main content
· 3/21/2001

Ehret v. Congoleum Corp.

Citations

  • 104 Cal. Rptr. 2d 370
  • 87 Cal. App. 4th 202

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • plaintiffs “refused to enter a satisfaction of judgment because, they argued, they were entitled to post-judgment interest from the date of the original . . . judgment” and on appeal prevailed on the issue
  • plaintiffs “refused to enter a satisfaction of judgment because, they argued, they were entitled to post-judgment interest from the date of the original . . . judgment” and on appeal prevailed on the issue

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Epstein

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.