· 3/21/2001
Ehret v. Congoleum Corp.
Citations
- 104 Cal. Rptr. 2d 370
- 87 Cal. App. 4th 202
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- plaintiffs “refused to enter a satisfaction of judgment because, they argued, they were entitled to post-judgment interest from the date of the original . . . judgment” and on appeal prevailed on the issue
- plaintiffs “refused to enter a satisfaction of judgment because, they argued, they were entitled to post-judgment interest from the date of the original . . . judgment” and on appeal prevailed on the issue
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Epstein
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.