Ehle v. Purdy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• child who is “potentially eligible for SIJ status, . . . was entitled to a hearing where the juvenile court would determine whether findings required for SIJ status existed”
• “Because [the juvenile] was potentially eligible for SIJ status, she was entitled to a- hearing where the juvenile court would détérmine whether findings required for SIJ status existed”
• “Under federal law, an unaccompanied minor has the right to petition the juvenile court for findings under the SIJ statute. . . . [T]he juvenile court erred in declining to consider Y.M.’s request for SIJ findings.” (footnote omitted)
• child who is “potentially eligible for SIJ 4 The applicable statute states that the determination of whether it would not be in the alien’s best interest to be returned must be made in “administrative or judicial proceedings.” 8 U. S. C. A. § 1101 (a) (27) (J) (ii

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).