Ehi Joseph Unuakhaulu v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that where denial of withholding of removal is not predicated on petition- er’s aggravated felony conviction, we have jurisdiction to review
• holding that “when the Attorney General decides that the alien’s offense was a ‘particularly serious crime,’ we lack jurisdiction to review such a decision because it is discre- tionary”
• acµnowledging that, 'where the IJ has reason to question the applicant's credibility,' a petitioner's failure 'to produce non-duplicative, material, easily available corroborating evidence' can support an adverse credibility determination (quotations omitted)
• holding that because “8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(C
• rejecting application of § 1252(a)(2)(C) where order of removal did not list alien’s conviction of aggravated felony as basis for removal
• upholding the Immigration Judge’s ruling that corroborating evidence was needed because the applicant’s conviction for fraud undermined his credibility

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).