· 6/8/2001
E.H. v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Division of Family & Youth Services
Citations
- 23 P.3d 1186
- 2001 Alas. LEXIS 68
- 2001 WL 632904
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that the court that makes the initial custody order retains jurisdiction until the child no longer has any substantial ties with the state
- stating that “the management plan, both in its original and its revised (and, in this case, amended) form, is much like a ‘rule’ as that term is defined in the Oregon APA”
- describing children as retaining “constructive Alaska residency for jurisdictional purposes” through interstate compact
- no indication of objection to offer of proof
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Fabe, Matthews, Eastaugh, Bryner
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.