Egener v. Juch
Citations
- 101 Cal. 105
- 35 P. 432
- 1894 Cal. LEXIS 989
Syllabus
<p>Attachment—Dissolution—Residence of Defendants—Conflicting Evidence.—An order dissolving an attachment against the defendants as nonresidents will be affirmed where the affidavits used on the motion conflict as to where their legal residence was at the date of the attachment, and it appears that they were then actually engaged in the state in professional work, and were served personally in the state with summons.</p> <p>Id.—Actual Residence—Domicile.—The residence referred to by the-attachment law is an actual, as contradistinguished from a constructive, or legal, residence or domicile.</p>
Judges: McFarland
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.