Skip to main content
· 9/14/2000

Egeland v. Continental Resources, Inc.

Citations

  • 2000 ND 169
  • 616 N.W.2d 861
  • 145 Oil & Gas Rep. 469
  • 2000 N.D. LEXIS 179
  • 2000 WL 1298025

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that in order to overcome presumption that oil and gas leases are indivisible, a Pugh clause must divide the lease “clearly and explicitly”
  • noting that a court must interpret a contract so as “to determine the true intent of the parties”
  • “A contract must be read and considered in its entirety so that all of its provisions are taken into consideration to determine the true intent of the parties.”
  • different rule of construction may apply to rights upon cessation of production
  • “The majority rule is governmental pooling and unitization orders do not divide a lease, and production anywhere on the pooled acreage holds all leases that may be wholly or partly in the unit.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Neumann, Vande Walle, Maring, Kapsner, Sandstrom

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.