· 9/14/2000
Egeland v. Continental Resources, Inc.
Citations
- 2000 ND 169
- 616 N.W.2d 861
- 145 Oil & Gas Rep. 469
- 2000 N.D. LEXIS 179
- 2000 WL 1298025
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that in order to overcome presumption that oil and gas leases are indivisible, a Pugh clause must divide the lease “clearly and explicitly”
- noting that a court must interpret a contract so as “to determine the true intent of the parties”
- “A contract must be read and considered in its entirety so that all of its provisions are taken into consideration to determine the true intent of the parties.”
- different rule of construction may apply to rights upon cessation of production
- “The majority rule is governmental pooling and unitization orders do not divide a lease, and production anywhere on the pooled acreage holds all leases that may be wholly or partly in the unit.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Neumann, Vande Walle, Maring, Kapsner, Sandstrom
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.