Egberts v. Dibble

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• although doctor suspected child abuse, questioning suspected parent without Article 31 warnings was permissible “to ascertain the facts for protective measures and curative purposes”
• questioning by military pediatrician for medical diagnosis
• clearly-erroneous standard or de novo standard
• questioning of parent by supervising pediatrician

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).