Egan v. Mutual Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• asserting that the insurance company would be estopped from relying on the policy’s limitations period in light of its refusal to redeliver a copy of the policy to the insured, which kept the insured ignorant of the contractual limitations period
• “The defendant having contended that the policy had been canceled prior to the loss, and that therefore there was no liability thereunder, it was unnecessary for the plaintiff to do a futile act in filing a proof of loss as required by the provisions of the policy.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).