E.G. v. Department of Children & Family Services

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that skiers had duty of care to fellow skiers because \requiring skiers to participate in the reasonable manner prescribed by the rules of the sport actually will promote participation in the sport of skiing\ by remedying harms and protecting safety
• “the proper construction of any statute must take into account the mandates of related statutes governing the same general subject matter” [internal quotation marks omitted]
• “[F]or inherent hazards, ski area operators owe skiers no duty of care and skiers assume the risk of those hazards in the primary sense.”
• “For those hazards which are not an innate part of the sport of skiing, or over which an operator can act reasonably to eliminate or minimize the potential for harm, operators owe skiers a duty of reasonable care.”
• 36 Conn. L. Rptr. 259

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).