· 9/11/2001
E.F.W. v. St. Stephen's Indian High School
Citations
- 264 F.3d 1297
- 2001 Colo. J. C.A.R. 4622
- 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 20140
- 2001 WL 1040371
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that tribal social services agency enjoyed tribal sovereign immunity
- affirming dismissal of a § 1983 claim because the defendants acted under color of tribal law
- applying tribal sovereign immunity to a social services employee and his supervisor
- “It is settled that a waiver of sovereign immunity cannot be implied but must be unequivocally expressed.” (quotation omitted)
- “[tfribal sovereign immunity is a matter of subject matter jurisdiction, which may be challenged by a motion to dismiss under Fed.R. Civ.R 12(b)(1)” (citation omitted)
- “Tribal sovereign immunity is a matter of subject matter jurisdiction, which may be challenged by a motion to dismiss under [Rule] 12(b)(1)”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Seymour, Brorby, Brown
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.