Skip to main content
· 9/11/2001

E.F.W. v. St. Stephen's Indian High School

Citations

  • 264 F.3d 1297
  • 2001 Colo. J. C.A.R. 4622
  • 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 20140
  • 2001 WL 1040371

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that tribal social services agency enjoyed tribal sovereign immunity
  • affirming dismissal of a § 1983 claim because the defendants acted under color of tribal law
  • applying tribal sovereign immunity to a social services employee and his supervisor
  • “It is settled that a waiver of sovereign immunity cannot be implied but must be unequivocally expressed.” (quotation omitted)
  • “[tfribal sovereign immunity is a matter of subject matter jurisdiction, which may be challenged by a motion to dismiss under Fed.R. Civ.R 12(b)(1)” (citation omitted)
  • “Tribal sovereign immunity is a matter of subject matter jurisdiction, which may be challenged by a motion to dismiss under [Rule] 12(b)(1)”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Seymour, Brorby, Brown

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.