Efrain Modesto Calle-Vujiles v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that we lack jurisdiction to review a denial by BIA to sua sponte grant a motion to reopen under 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a)
• holding that there is no jurisdiction to review sua sponte failures to reopen under the doctrine of Heckler v. Chaney, 470 U.S. 821, 830 (1985
• concluding that we lack jurisdiction to review a denial by BIA to sua sponte grant a motion to reopen under 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a)
• explaining that general time limitations apply to motions to reopen in absentia deportation orders filed with the BIA
• explaining that general time limitations apply to motions to reopen in absentia deportation orders filed with the BIA
• dismissing a petition for review for “lack of appellate jurisdiction” after determining that the “BIA retains unfettered discretion to decline to sua sponte reopen or reconsider a deportation proceeding”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).