· 4/7/2005
Efford v. Milam
Citations
- 368 F. Supp. 2d 380
- 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5823
- 2005 WL 783346
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that correspondence from the plaintiffs’ counsel fell within the purview of “other paper.”
- triggering based upon attorney correspondence
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Yohn
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.