Skip to main content
· 4/7/2005

Efford v. Milam

Citations

  • 368 F. Supp. 2d 380
  • 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5823
  • 2005 WL 783346

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that correspondence from the plaintiffs’ counsel fell within the purview of “other paper.”
  • triggering based upon attorney correspondence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Yohn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.