Skip to main content
· 5/20/1884

Effinger v. Cates

Citations

  • 61 Tex. 590
  • 1884 Tex. LEXIS 154

Syllabus

<p>1. Homestead.— An uninclosed lot in a city, separated by a public square from the lot on which the home residence was erected, was used occasionally by the owner as a place on which he staked out his horse and calf, exercising in this no greater exclusive use than he could make of the uninclosed property of others. In November, 1877, this uninclosed lot was levied on under execution against the owner and sold. Held, that the use made of the property for homestead purposes was not sufficient to extend the protection of the homestead exemption from sale over it,</p>

Judges: App, Com, Delany

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.