Effie L. WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. Louis W. SULLIVAN, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that psychiatrist’s report was new because it was not merely cumulative but instead presented more specific findings and conclusions
• concluding that psychiatrist’s report was new because it was not merely cumulative but instead presented more specific findings and conclusions
• concluding that psychiatrist’s report was new because it was not merely cumulative but instead presented more specific findings and conclusions
• finding that despite failure to identify onset date, doctor’s report was material because it provided sufficient basis to conclude it related to the relevant time
• finding that despite failure to identify onset date, doctor’s report was material because it provided sufficient basis to conclude it related to the relevant time
• holding Appeals Council erred in finding that additional evidence was not new or material and refusing the consider the evidence; remanding for consideration of the additional evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).