EEOC v. CVS Pharmacy, Incorporated

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that petitioners may challenge proposed substitute claims out- side of §§ 102 and 103
• the Board “is permitted to review and deny proposed substitute claims during IPR proceedings for patent ineligibility pursuant to § 101”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).