Skip to main content
· 3/18/1988

Edwin Lamb Hooper v. National Transportation Safety Board

Citations

  • 841 F.2d 1150
  • 268 U.S. App. D.C. 325
  • 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 3391
  • 1988 WL 22221

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the failure to enforce a procedural rule uniformly is arbitrary and capricious
  • discussing NTSB’s authority to dismiss appeals under Board rule for failure to file timely briefs
  • discussing NTSB’s authority to dismiss appeals under board rule for failure to file timely briefs
  • discussing NTSB’s authority to dismiss appeals under Board rule for failure to file timely briefs
  • “We do not, of course, hold that the [Board] has no power to enforce its [procedural default] rule as strictly as it pleases. . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mikva, Starr, Silberman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.