Edwin C. Tiemann and Maudie Joyce Tiemann v. Tul-Center, Inc., Downtown Tulsa Unlimited, James G. Norton, and City of Tulsa

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the 10 Oklahoma Governmental Tort Claims Act did not immunize the defendants from liability under 42 U.S.C. § 1983
• holding that the Oklahoma Governmental Tort Claims Act (Okla. Stat. Ann. tit. 51, §§ 151-171. (1988 & Supp. 1994)) did not immunize the defendants from liability under 42 U.S.C. § 1983
• district court erred in concluding OGTCA immunized defendants from § 1983 liability; conduct by persons acting under color of state law which is wrongful under § 1983 cannot be immunized by state law
• “While subjective pain testimony cannot be rejected on the sole 19 ground that it is not fully corroborated by objective medical evidence, the medical evidence is 20 still a relevant factor in determining the severity of the claimant’s pain and its disabling 21 effects.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).