Edwards v. Toys\ R\ US

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a chief information officer’s personal knowledge of payment card industry standards could be inferred by his position
• holding that 19 corporations can be held vicariously liable for the FCRA violations of their agents
• stating that question of fact existed as to whether person involved in FCRA violation was defendant’s agent, and thus whether vicarious liability attached
• “Evidence is not ‘new[]’ .. . if it is submitted in direct response to proof adduced in opposition to a motion.”
• “Evidence is not ‘new[]’ .. . if it is submitted in direct response to proof adduced in opposition to a motion.”
• “Evidence is not ‘new,’ however, if it is submitted in direct 23 response to proof adduced in opposition to a motion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• In re Conagra Foods, Inc.
  C.D. California· 2015-02-23· cited 74×
• In re Toys \R\ US-Delaware, Inc.
  C.D. California· 2014-01-17· cited 70×
• In re Conagra Foods, Inc.
  C.D. California· 2014-08-01· cited 51×
• Taylor v. First Advantage Background Services Corp.
  N.D. California· 2016-09-13· cited 32×
• Serrano v. Sterling Testing Systems, Inc.
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2010-05-07· cited 22×
• Goode v. LexisNexis Risk & Information Analytics Group, Inc.
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2012-03-22· cited 22×
• Barel v. Bank of America
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2009-01-16· cited 18×
• Johnson v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc.
  D. Nevada· 2008-05-14· cited 15×
• Philbrick v. eNom, Inc.
  D. New Hampshire· 2009-01-22· cited 13×
• Hardy v. 3 UNKNOWN AGENTS
  C.D. California· 2010-02-09· cited 13×
• Ramirez v. Midwest Airlines, Inc.
  D. Kansas· 2008-03-12· cited 12×
• Smith v. E-BackgroundChecks.com, Inc.
  N.D. Georgia· 2015-01-20· cited 9×
• In re Toys \R\ Us-Delaware, Inc.—Fair & Accurate Credit Transactions Act (FACTA) Litigation
  C.D. California· 2013-01-11· cited 9×
• Starkey v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.
  C.D. California· 2014-01-08· cited 7×
• Smith v. Lexisnexis Screening Solutions, Inc.
  E.D. Michigan· 2014-12-30· cited 7×
• Zkey Investments, LLC v. Facebook Inc.
  C.D. California· 2016-12-02· cited 5×
• Miller v. Johnson & Johnson, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
  M.D. Florida· 2015-01-14· cited 3×
• Smith v. Lexisnexis Screening Solutions Inc.
  E.D. Michigan· 2015-09-30· cited 3×
• Martinez v. Columbia Sportswear USA Corp.
  E.D. California· 2012-05-09· cited 3×
• Lynch v. N. Am. Co.
  D. Idaho· 2018-01-10· cited 2×

Cites

55 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 135,235×
• Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of Catrett
  Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 119,442×
• Farmer v. Brennan
  Supreme Court· 1994-06-06· cited 28,443×
• Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.
  Supreme Court· 2007-06-21· cited 6,044×
• Ernst & Ernst v. Hochfelder
  Supreme Court· 1976-05-19· cited 3,533×
• Taylor v. List
  Ninth Circuit· 1989-07-17· cited 2,764×
• McLaughlin v. Richland Shoe Co.
  Supreme Court· 1988-05-16· cited 1,362×
• Safeco Insurance Co. of America v. Burr
  Supreme Court· 2007-06-04· cited 1,225×
• Ratzlaf v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1994-01-11· cited 1,218×
• Bryan v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1998-06-15· cited 683×
• Rutherford Food Corp. v. McComb
  Supreme Court· 1947-06-16· cited 681×
• Thornhill Publishing Company, Inc. v. General Telephone & Electronics Corporation
  Ninth Circuit· 1979-03-22· cited 514×
• Provenz v. Miller
  Ninth Circuit· 1996-09-11· cited 384×
• Cosmas v. Hassett
  Second Circuit· 1989-09-12· cited 371×
• Renie Guimond v. Trans Union Credit Information Company
  Ninth Circuit· 1995-01-19· cited 316×
• Jennifer Cushman v. Trans Union Corporation
  Third Circuit· 1997-06-09· cited 216×
• Paul E. Black v. Tic Investment Corp. Stratton Georgoulis, Individually and James H. Slife, Individually
  Seventh Circuit· 1990-04-18· cited 214×
• Catawba Indian Tribe of South Carolina v. State of S.C.
  Fourth Circuit· 1992-09-22· cited 180×
• Barthelemy v. Air Lines Pilots Ass'n
  Ninth Circuit· 1990-03-06· cited 156×
• Unnamed case
  Ninth Circuit· 2000-07-13· cited 147×