Edwards v. Timmons

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trial court’s unappealed order of reference to a master-in-equity became the law of the case
• holding that the trial court’s unappealed order of reference to a master in equity became the law of the case
• finding appellant could not complain after final order that she was deprived of her right to a jury trial because she did not appeal the order referring the matter to the master in equity
• where appellant did not appeal the order referring matter to master in equity, she could not complain after final order that she was deprived of her right to a trial by jury
• where appellant did not appeal the order referring matter to master in equity, she could not complain after final order that she was deprived of her right to a trial by jury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).