Edwards v. Thompson
Citations
- 99 Wash. 188
- 169 P. 327
- 1917 Wash. LEXIS 1039
Syllabus
<p>Alteration of Instruments—Acts of Stranger—“Spoliation”— Effect. A delivery to an attorney of a mortgage for the sole purpose of filing it for record does not make him the agent of the mortgagor, with authority to make alterations by inserting an omitted description, such insertion being a spoliation by a stranger which does not affect the validity of the mortgage.</p> <p>Reformation of Instruments—Mutual Mistake. Where, by mutual mistake, a description of two lots was omitted from the mortgage, reformation of the instrument will be granted to make it express the agreement and intent of the parties.</p>
Judges: Webster
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Nichols v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1834-06-15· cited 62×
- Walsh v. HuntCalifornia Supreme Court· 1898-02-05· cited 44×
- White Sewing Machine Co. v. DakinMichigan Supreme Court· 1891-07-28· cited 13×
- Gleason v. . HamiltonNew York Court of Appeals· 1893-06-06· cited 11×
- City of Orlando v. GoodingSupreme Court of Florida· 1894-06-15· cited 9×
- Deering Harvester Co. v. WhiteTennessee Supreme Court· 1902-12-15· cited 7×
- Ames v. BrownSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1875-10-21· cited 6×
- Bridges v. WintersMississippi Supreme Court· 1868-10-15· cited 6×
- Miller v. StarkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1892-03-28· cited 5×
- Ætna National Bank v. WinchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1876-02-15· cited 5×
- Lanum v. PattersonAppellate Court of Illinois· 1908-04-21· cited 4×
- Fry v. JenkinsAppellate Court of Illinois· 1912-06-27· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.