Edwards v. State Board of Barber Examiners

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating Arizona’s due process provision a corollary to federal Due Process Clause
• \The courts are to interfere only when the ordinance enacted pursuant to the grant is arbitrary and unreasonable.\
• “[W]e are unable to find any relationship, either in logic or common sense, between the public health and safety and price-fixing in the barbering profession.”
• “[T]he courts will acquiesce in the legislative determination of all matters of fact unless it is clearly erroneous, arbitrary and wholly unwarranted.”
• “[W]here an enactment bears any reasonable relationship to the end sought the courts may not substitute their judgment for the judgment of the legislature.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).