Edwards v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, once the notice for a direct appeal was filed, the trial court had no jurisdiction to decide a rule 3.850 motion then pending in the case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Omasta v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-11-15
• Edwards v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-03-04

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Cabrera v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-11-13· cited 9×
• Akel v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-07-29· cited 1×
• Walker v. Walker
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-09-05· cited 1×