Edwards v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• relief was not warranted due to a violation of a jury composition provision of the UAP
• trial court correctly found that under-representation of cognizable group by 6.04 percent is generally not unconstitutional

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Humphreys v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2010-03-15· cited 98×
• Ellington v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2012-11-19· cited 61×
• In re Interest of I.L.M.
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2018-06-29· cited 15×
• State v. Remy
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2020-03-13· cited 13×
• In THE INTEREST OF I. L. M., Children
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2018-06-29· cited 11×
• Worthy v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2010-11-04· cited 5×
• Sinkfield v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2021-05-17· cited 5×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Cook v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1986-03-07· cited 90×
• Morrow v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2000-06-12· cited 90×
• Parks v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1985-05-17· cited 81×
• Smith v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2002-10-28· cited 30×
• Ramirez v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2003-01-13· cited 22×
• Russell v. Russell
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1987-06-19· cited 9×
• Jones v. Jones
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1986-07-16· cited 6×