District Court of Appeal of Florida· 7/26/2000
Edwards v. State
Citations
- 765 So. 2d 222
- 2000 WL 1021272
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “While appellant is correct, and we would normally remand for resen-tencing pursuant to Smith v. State, 761 So.2d 419 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000), this issue has been made moot by appellant’s release from incarceration on March 10, 2000.”
- Heggs issue is moot based on the defendant’s release from incarceration
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Toomer v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-03-08· cited 35×
- Hagan v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-09-05· cited 15×
- Butler v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-05-21· cited 1×
- N.S. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-02-18· cited 1×
- Pizano v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-11-06· cited 1×
- NS v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-02-18
- BENJAMIN G. PARRISH v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-02-20
- JAMES S. CAUSEY v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-06-19
- LYNDA BAKER v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-10-02
- ROGER W. WALLS v. THE STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2021-08-11
- Causey v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-06-19
- Hane v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-02-24
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.