Edwards v. Pettit Construction Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding a finding of fact by the Commission “may not be based upon surmise, conjecture, or speculation, but must be founded on evidence of sufficient substance to afford a reasonable basis for it”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Mullinax v. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1995-05-08· cited 35×
• Burnette v. City of Greenville
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2012-12-05· cited 22×
• Glover v. RHETT JACKSON CO. OF BUSH RIVER RD.
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1980-05-15· cited 6×
• Sharpe v. Case Produce Co.
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1997-12-22· cited 6×
• Hutson v. S.C. State Ports Authority
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2010-09-08· cited 5×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Wynn v. Peoples Natural Gas Co. of SC
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1961-03-13· cited 32×
• Grice v. Dickerson, Inc.
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1962-10-23· cited 25×
• Sligh v. Newberry Electric Cooperative, Inc.
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1950-04-13· cited 12×
• Dawkins v. Capitol Construction Co.
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1967-11-27· cited 9×