Skip to main content
· 9/22/2016

Edwards v. Illinois Department of Financial & Professional Regulation

Citations

  • 210 F. Supp. 3d 931
  • 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 129485
  • 2016 WL 5233460

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that there is \no question\ comparative negligence of plaintiff is generally disregarded in workplace setting
  • stating that there is “no question” comparative negligence of plaintiff is generally disregarded in workplace setting
  • deposing experts before trial more \fully reveal[s] the bases for\ the \theories in their reports\
  • first citing Suter, 81 N.J. at 167–68; and then citing Ramos v. Silent Hoist & Crane Co., 256 N.J. Super. 467, 478 (App. Div. 1992)
  • In a products liability action, a defendant can still attack proximate cause, but the court should issue an instruction limiting the evidence of fault to that issue alone.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Aspen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.