Edwards v. Heartland Payment Systems, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “the inquiry does not turn on whether a complaint includes (or omits) any magic phrase, such as FAPE or IEP”
• declining to decide the issue of whether a hostile work environment claim is actionable under the ADA, but noting that every other circuit court to address the issue has held such a claim is actionable
• “McIntyre did not otherwise seek or receive special education—or, for that matter, an IEP”
• “we remand for further consideration whether McIntyre’s claims are subject to minority tolling”
• “comply[ing] with an emergency health protocol” is not special instruction.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).