Edwards v. Ghandour

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that this court need not consider alleged errors when not supported by any pertinent legal authority
• noting that this court need not consider alleged errors when not supported by any pertinent legal authority
• holding that the district court's stay, based on misinformation and later rescinded, did not toll NRCP 41(e) when plaintiff knew the stay was invalid and he \did not take appropriate action to move his case forward and set aside the stay\
• holding that the district court's stay, based on misinformation and later rescinded, did not toll NRCP 41(e) when plaintiff knew the stay was invalid and he \did not take appropriate action to move his case forward and set aside the stay\
• holding that the district court's stay, based on misinformation and later rescinded, did not toll NRCP 41(e) when plaintiff knew the stay was invalid and he \did not take appropriate action to move his case forward and set aside the stay\
• holding that the district court's stay, based on misinformation and later rescinded, did not toll NRCP 41(e) when plaintiff knew the stay was invalid and he \did not take appropriate action to move his case forward and set aside the stay\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).