· 3/30/2006
Edwards v. Emperor's Garden Restaurant
Citations
- 130 P.3d 1280
- 122 Nev. 317
- 122 Nev. Adv. Rep. 28
- 2006 Nev. LEXIS 34
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that an appellate court need not consider issues that are not cogently argued
- explaining that this court need not consider arguments that are not cogently made and supported by salient authority
- noting that the appellate courts need not consider claims unsupported by cogent argument or relevant authority
- stating that the court need not address issues not cogently argued or supported by relevant authority
- explaining that it is an appellant's responsibility to present cogent arguments
- noting this court need not consider arguments not adequately briefed and not supported by relevant authority
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Maupin, Gibbons, Hardesty
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.