Skip to main content
· 3/30/2006

Edwards v. Emperor's Garden Restaurant

Citations

  • 130 P.3d 1280
  • 122 Nev. 317
  • 122 Nev. Adv. Rep. 28
  • 2006 Nev. LEXIS 34

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an appellate court need not consider issues that are not cogently argued
  • explaining that this court need not consider arguments that are not cogently made and supported by salient authority
  • noting that the appellate courts need not consider claims unsupported by cogent argument or relevant authority
  • stating that the court need not address issues not cogently argued or supported by relevant authority
  • explaining that it is an appellant's responsibility to present cogent arguments
  • noting this court need not consider arguments not adequately briefed and not supported by relevant authority

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Maupin, Gibbons, Hardesty

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.