· 12/29/2005
Edwards v. Direct Access, LLC
Citations
- 124 P.3d 1158
- 121 Nev. 929
- 121 Nev. Adv. Rep. 89
- 2005 Nev. LEXIS 108
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that “a separate state law or rule of court conferring jurisdiction to consider TCPA claims in state court is not necessary for the state court to have jurisdiction over the federal claim”
- considering only \opt-out\ and \opt-in\ approaches and adopting \opt-out\ approach on the basis of supremacy-clause principles
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Maupin, Gibbons, Hardesty
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.