Edwards v. Department of Children & Youth Services

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “prior case law that distinguished between the ‘discretionary’ and ‘ministerial’ acts of state employees as the basis for state liability[]” is no longer the appropriate analysis
• reversing grant of summary judgment where subject exception to waiver of sovereign immunity did not apply
• claim that Youth Development Center personnel were negligent in failing to provide proper medical care to juvenile in their custody
• decision on type of emergency medical care to provide incarcerated juveniles does not fall within the exception
• decision on type of emergency medical care to provide incarcerated juveniles does not fall within the exception
• state employees’ decision on the type of emergency medical care to provide Edwards did not involve policy judgments

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).